- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Greenness, blueness, and whiteness evaluation of a quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance procedure for concurrent assay of aspirin and omeprazole in their single and fixed-dose combined tablets
BMC Chemistry volume 19, Article number: 117 (2025)
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a fixed dose combination of aspirin and omeprazole that has been introduced for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, as it reduces the risk of upper gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events in aspirin-treated patients. Therefore, an optimized eco-friendly, simple, fast, and precise quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy technique was presented for the concurrent estimation of that mixture in their single and combined dosage forms. The quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy concurrent estimation of both drugs was achieved using phloroglucinol as the internal standard and dimethyl sulfoxide as a deuterated solvent. An ideal set of acquisition parameters was determined to be 128 scans, 10 s relaxation latency, and 90° pulse angle. The selected quantitative signal of aspirin was the doublet of doublet signal appeared at 7.945 ppm, while that of omeprazole was the singlet signal at 8.18 ppm. The singlet signal at 5.69 ppm was selected for the internal standard. The spectra were subjected to integration, baseline correction, and auto phase correction. The developed quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy method was found to be rectilinear over the range of 0.05–4.0 mg mL−1 for both drugs. The detecting and quantifying limits for both drugs were approximately 0.01 and 0.03 mg mL−1, respectively. Neither labelling nor pretreatment steps were needed to assay the studied drugs using our developed quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy method. The proposed nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy approach was effectively evaluated in terms of linearity (r = 0.9999), accuracy, and precision (%RSD < 1.08). Furthermore, the suggested technique was investigated to analyze the studied drugs in their single and combined dosages. This work enables clinicians to simultaneously monitor aspirin and omeprazole levels in both single and fixed-dose combination tablets, ensuring precise dosing and effective treatment management. For patients, it supports safer therapy by reducing the risks associated with improper dosing or drug interactions in combination therapies. After evaluating the method's greenness, whiteness and blueness, it was determined that the suggested approach was environmentally friendly. The suggested approach was compared with the previously reported methods from both an analytical and eco-friendly perspective.
Introduction
Aspirin (ASP) and omeprazole (OMP) combination has been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and formulated into new pharmaceutical tablets for therapy and prophylaxis of cardiovascular disorders (CVD) in individuals suffering from stomach disorders and stomach ulcers. ASP shown in Fig. 1a, is a well-known antiplatelet medication that is thought to be essential for treating and preventing CVD [1, 2]. But, it has risky side consequences in individuals with peptic ulcers and stomach disorders [3]. Therefore, antiulcer medications must be used in conjunction with ASP to avoid that unfavorable side effect [4]. To meet such requirements, FDA approved a novel ASP and OMP combination in 2016. OMP shown in Fig. 1b, is an antiulcer that works as a proton pump inhibitor to treat the symptoms of acid reflux [5]. With this combination, patients who were at risk of developing a peptic ulcer while taking ASP should have a lower chance of stroke or heart attack [6].
Since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality [7], various analytical methodologies were developed for concurrent estimation of ASP and OMP. A review of the literature on ASP and OMP analysis showed that various chromatographic [8,9,10,11,12] and spectrophotometric methods [11, 13,14,15,16] were reported for their individual or simultaneous analysis. Currently, there is no documented 1H-qNMR method for the concurrent analysis of ASP and OMP.
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was initially used for structural analysis, then it has evolved to include quantification, relying on the correlation between signal strength and the number of nuclei producing resonance [17]. As a result, the ratio of the drug's signals to those of an internal standard is used to calculate the analyte's content.
NMR technique has a lot of advantages as it is characterized by the excellent precision and accuracy with the ability to efficient determination of pharmaceutical compounds purity [18]. It provides rapid, easy measurement with non-destructive analysis, and does not require pure analyte forms for calibration, as the signal strength is proportional to proton quantity [19,20,21]. Additionally, no prior isolation is needed for analyzing multicomponent mixtures [17, 22]. All these benefits besides the ability to recover the analytes, NMR technique is found to be a good green approach for pharmaceutical compounds analysis. Herein, we report the first green 1H-qNMR methodology to simultaneously evaluate ASP and OMP in their single dosage forms and fixed-dose combined tablets.
Green analytical chemistry (GAC) has appeared recently around the 2000 s [23, 24]. This field focuses on reducing hazardous reagent use and enhancing protection for both analysts and the environment [25]. Evaluating the greenness of analytical methodologies is essential for assessing their environmental impact. A comprehensive approach was used to assess sustainability, covering greenness, performance, safety, and cost-efficiency, with tools like NEMI, GAPI, eco-scale, and AGREE for greenness, RGB12 for whiteness, and BAGI for blueness. The suggested approach excels in simplicity, eco-friendliness, speed, and consistency, with no need for prior extraction.
Experimental
Materials and reagents
Aspirin (certified as 99.87% purity) was obtained from ADWIA Pharmaceutical Company (Qalyubia, Egypt). Omeprazole (certified as 99.80% purity) was obtained by Pharco Pharmaceuticals Company (Alexandria, Egypt).
Omez® capsules, marked as containing 40.0 mg of OMP in each capsule, Jusprin®, marked as containing 81.0 mg of ASP per tablet and Yosprala®, labeled to contain 40.0 mg omeprazole and 81.0 mg aspirin per tablet, were bought from a local pharmacy, Mansoura, Egypt.
The deuterated solvent utilized for quantifying this mixture was DMSO-d6, procured from Cambridge Isotope Labs, Inc. (D, 99.96% purity). Deuterium oxide (D, 99.90%), chloroform-d1 (D, 99.80%), acetone-d6 (D, 99.90%), and formic acid were all acquired from Sigma-Aldrich. Phloroglucinol anhydrous was obtained from Chemi-pharm for Pharm. Industries in Giza, Egypt.
Apparatus
A Bruker Avance III (AV-III-400) spectrometer was used to obtain 1H NMR spectra, Pharmacy Center of Scientific Excellent (PCSE), Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt. q-NMR experiments were achieved using these parameters: sample temperature (20 °C), frequency offset (6.175 ppm), spectral width (15 ppm), relaxation delay (10 s), acquisition time (4.08 s), number of scans (128), flip angle (90˚), dummy scans (2), sample spin (on), datapoints (65536), and fixed receiver gain value (32 dB). 1H NMR Spectra were automatically adjusted with TOPSPIN (V. 3.0, Bruker Biospin, Spring, TX, USA) for baseline and phase distortions. The energy consumption per sample was 1.0 kWh per sample.
Preparation of standards
ASP, OMP (10.0 mg mL−1 each) and phloroglucinol (100.0 mg mL−1) were prepared individually by dissolving 0.05 g and 0.5 g of each drug raw powder, respectively, into three separate 5.0 mL volumetric flasks using DMSO-d6 as a solvent.
Calibration curves
The prepared standards were subjected to 20 min of sonication to ensure uniformity and dissolution. Varying amounts of ASP and OMP standard solutions were accurately transferred into sealed glass vials to generate solutions spanning concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 4.0 mg mL−1 for both substances. A precisely measured volume of phloroglucinol (internal standard) was then introduced into each vial to produce a final concentration of 10.0 mg mL−1. Subsequently, the content of each vial was adjusted with DMSO-d6 to 2.0 mL final volume. Thereafter, q-NMR analysis was conducted by transferring 0.5 mL of each vial to a 5-mm NMR tube, followed by acquiring the proton spectra for each concentration in triplicate using optimized parameters. Calibration curves were obtained by plotting the absolute integral area ratios against the final drug concentrations of each analyte. Finally, the regression equations for the studied drugs were obtained.
Analysis of ASP and OMP in their synthetic mixtures
ASP and OMP standards were created by combining 0.0608 g of ASP and 0.03 g of OMP in a glassy sealed vial, then topped up with DMSO-d6 solvent to 3.0 mL, resulting in 20.27 mg mL−1 and 10.0 mg mL−1 final concentrations for both ASP and OMP, respectively. Maintaining a ratio of 1: 2.03 between OMP and ASP replicated the medicinal ratio found in Yosprala® tablets. The described procedures for generating calibration graphs were followed, and the percentage of recoveries was assessed.
Assay of dosage forms
To assay ASP and OMP in their dosage forms, ten Jusprine® tablets were taken for individual analysis of ASP, ten Omez® capsules were taken for analysis of OMP, and ten Yosprala® tablets (81 mg ASP and 40 mg OMP per tablet) were taken for concurrent analysis of ASP and OMP.
For the tablet dosage forms, ten tablets of each formulation (Jusprine® or Yosprala® formulations) were weighed, finely pulverized, and thoroughly mixed to obtain a homogenous powder. On the other hand, Ten Omez® capsules were emptied and their contents were mixed well and weighed for the next steps.
Thereafter, a specific amount of each powdered drug formulation was precisely placed into an individual glass vial with stopper, and a specified volume of DMSO-d6 was added. To ensure complete solubility, sonication was performed for 10 min on each of the three vials. The methods described above were used to create the calibration graphs and the percentage recoveries and nominal contents of the analytes in their formulations were calculated.
Results and discussion
The proposed method allows for better quality control of ASP and OMP in pharmaceutical formulations, ensuring consistent drug quality for patients. Clinically, it supports improved therapeutic outcomes by enabling healthcare providers to verify the integrity of both single and combination therapies prescribed to patients. The developed 1H-qNMR method was thoroughly optimized to analyze the target compounds effectively in their single and combined formulations. The optimization process involved careful selection of solvent, internal standard, and exploration of various NMR's technical specifications, as pulse angle, scanning number, and relaxation delay time. DMSO-d6 was the optimal solvent to be used to assay the studied analytes. Phloroglucinol was identified as the ideal internal standard, producing a singlet signal at 5.69 ppm. This signal was effectively distinguished from the signals selected for quantifying ASP and OMP. To quantitatively determine the studied analytes, a doublet of doublet signal of ASP at 7.945 ppm (7.93, 7.94, 7.95, 7.96 ppm) and a singlet signal of OMP at 8.18 ppm were selected. These signals were well-resolved and conducive to qNMR application under the optimized parameters, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
Deuterated solvents
Various deuterated solvents were assessed to identify the optimal one for achieving quantitative analysis of the two studied analytes without any interference. DMSO-d6, acetone-d6, chloroform-d1, and deuterium oxide were investigated in our study. DMSO-d6 was found as the most suitable choice due to several factors: (1) it has a signal at 2.5 ppm, which does not interfere with the signals of ASP and OMP, and (2) it did not volatilize at room temperature, rendering excellent solubility of the drugs under investigation.
Internal standard
Several substances were investigated to choose the most suitable one to act as internal standard. Phloroglucinol was selected as the most suitable internal standard, as it showed a good solubility and stability with both ASP and OMP. Besides, its quantitative signal does not interfere with that of the studied drugs in DMSO‑d6. Additionally, it is available in high purity.
Optimization of technical NMR parameters
Various parameters influencing the resolution efficiency of 1H-qNMR technique were investigated to determine the optimal conditions. The selected parameters were carefully chosen to guarantee the effective quantification of the studied drugs with satisfactory outcomes. These parameters encompassed the pulse angle, scan number, and relaxation delay time.
Scan number
The scanning number is a crucial parameter affecting the signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, various numbers of scans were examined including 16, 32, 64, and 128. It was observed that raising the scan number led to longer scanning times and enhanced sensitivity. Every experiment was conducted 3 times, and the averages were summarized, as illustrated in Fig. 3a. A scan number of 128 was identified as the optimal choice, offering high sensitivity and satisfactory reproducibility.
Pulse angle
Various pulse angles were explored while maintaining the scan number and the relaxation delay time at 128 and 10 s, respectively. The tried pulse angles were 10°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The absolute integral areas corresponding to these angles were plotted in Fig. 3b. The findings revealed that a pulse angle of 90° is the most suitable, as it exhibited the highest values for the studied analytes.
Relaxation delay time
Various relaxation delay times, including 0, 5, 10, and 20 s, were examined while maintaining the scan number at 128 and the pulse angle at 90°. Figure 3c showed that the optimal relaxation delay time was 10 s. This duration was sufficient to guarantee complete relaxation (longitudinal) between two consecutive pulses, resulting in optimal signal separation and accurate quantification of the studied analytes.
Validation
The proposed method was assessed and validated according to ICH guidelines [26]:
Linearity, range and quantitation and detection limits
Linear relationships were obtained upon plotting the absolute integral area ratios against drugs’ concentrations over the range of 0.05–4.0 mg mL−1. The resulting data were statistically analyzed to study the method performance [27]. Linear regression analysis of the data and the analytical performance of the proposed approach were presented in Table 1.
Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were calculated from the regression data according to ICH [26] suggestions, using the following equations:
where,"Sa"represents the standard deviation of the intercept, and"b"denotes the slope of the calibration curve.
The results verified that the suggested method exhibited sufficient sensitivity with LOD ≤ 0.01 and LOQ ≤ 0.03 mg ml−1. The small values of LOD and LOQ qualifies the proposed method ideal for the concurrent assay of ASP and OMP in their co-formulated dosage form (Table S1).
Accuracy and precision
The accuracy of the proposed NMR method was investigated. A first-order derivative spectrophotometric comparison method [14] was employed to compare the analytical results obtained by our 1H-qNMR method for both analytes with this reported comparison method, reporting any significant difference. In brief. three different concentrations of both drugs were measured in triplicate. The percentage of recovery was assessed for each drug concentration, and the average recovery rates (% purity) are presented in Table S2. By applying both Student t-test and variance ratio F-test, satisfactory results were obtained in terms of accuracy and precision, as there was no significant difference as shown in Table S2.
Two level precision of 1H-qNMR method was evaluated for both intra-day and inter-day variations by conducting triplicate assays of ASP and OMP, each in their pure form, at three concentration levels (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg ml−1) for the studied analytes over one day and for three consecutive days, respectively. As shown in Table S3, the low relative standard deviation values attest to the method's exceptional precision and consistency employed.
Specificity
The suggested approach specificity was investigated by ensuring no interference from the excipients was detected. Proton NMR spectra of the used solvent (DMSO-d6), internal standard, drug samples and standards were measured separately. Figure 2 showed well-separated signals of the studied drugs and the internal standard without any overlap, demonstrating the specificity of the suggested method. Figure 4a showed 1H-NMR spectra of the synthetic mixture of ASP and OMP, while Fig. 4b showed the signals of ASP and OMP in dosage form. It was obvious that the solvent and the tablet excipients did not affect the studied drugs signals after extraction from tablet.
Stability
The probe-head allows for the good reproducibility of repeating the experiment multiple times over a lengthy period because there is a limited contamination possibility, no dilution, or analyte-detector interaction during an NMR experiment. When utilizing NMR approach, these characteristics enable a decrease in the cost of validation measures. Drug stability was assessed by analyzing a specified sample solution at different time intervals (e.g., 0, 12, 24, and 48 h) at room temperature. The resulted relative standard deviation percentages of both drugs in Table S4 confirmed the stability of them for this time. The acquired data were consistent with the general stability rule, since the RSD was less than 3.0% and the assay difference from the original value is not greater than 1.0% [28].
Applications
Assay of ASP and OMP in the synthetic mixtures and in their single and combined dosage forms
The suggested 1H-qNMR technique was successfully applied to assay both drugs in their laboratory-prepared mixtures. Figure 4a shows the efficient resolution of the synthetic mixture of ASP and OMP with no interference or overlap between each other. Table S5 presents the comparative data obtained from the concurrent analysis of ASP and OMP in a synthetic mixture using both the recommended 1H-qNMR method and the comparison technique. The results showed no considerable difference in terms of accuracy and precision.
Moreover, the proposed method was efficient in assaying both drugs in single and combined dosage forms with high specificity and selectivity. Figure 4b shows the efficient separation of the ASP and OMP in their combined dosage form with no overlap from formulations'additives. The resulting data underwent statistical analysis using student's t-test and variance ratio F-test (Table S6). As detailed in Table S6, the small % RSV and high percentage of recoveries confirmed the appropriate analytical utility of the recommended technique for quality control of ASP and OMP in both single and combined pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Evaluation of greenness, whiteness and blueness
The first investigated greenness evaluation tool for our developed method is analytical eco-scale [29], in which we subtracted 1 penalty points for DMSO‑d6, 2 for energy consumption, and 3 penalty points for waste generation, to render a total score of 94.0, confirnming the excellent green methodology (Table 1).
The second evaluating tool in our study is the National environmental method index (NEMI), which is an old tool [30]. The assessment result indicated the greenness of our method as it acquired green color of the four (Table 1).
Green Analytical procedures Index (GAPI) is the third greenness tool that was employed to assess the sustainability of our developed method [31, 32]. This tool is an excellent semi-quantitative tool for laboratory practice since it provides details on all 15 parameters involved in the process, from sampling to the final determination. Płotka-Wasylka and Wojnowski introduced complexed GAPI, and they also offer highly useful software to build the complexed GAPI figure automatically and with ease based on each method's inputs [33]. Complex GAPI pictogram for the proposed method that ensures its greenness is presented in Table 1.
Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metric was also employed to assesss the greenness of our developed method [34,35,36,37]. AGREE allowed the weighing of each evaluated criterion, resulting in a total AGREE score (0–1) that represents to what extent the method is green. The proposed approaches acquire 0.72 total score (Table 1).
The Red–Green–Blue (RGB) model, which was presented lately, is thought to be a quantitative assessment metric that determines how white the analytical procedure is [38, 39]. It uses the three basic colors including red, green, and blue to represent the three essential elements of the analytical process that is being assessed. Analytical efficiency is denoted by red; adherence to green chemistry principles is denoted by green; and practical/economic efficiency is denoted by blue. The suggested method gained a total score of 97.7, indicating that they were well-fitting to the three essential principles (Table 1).
A tool called Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) [40] was just released. It offers a quantitative way to evaluate the"blueness"or practicality of the analytical methodologies. BAGI score has a range of 25–100, and the most practical method is the one of the highest scores (near 100). It can be used to quickly find the strong and weak points of a method in terms of its applicability. Table 1 shows that the suggested procedure achieved a high BAGI score of 80, indicating exceptional blueness. Such a great result confirms that our method has a lot to offer in terms of general functioning, hazard mitigation, and time and money savings.
Comparison between the proposed and the reported methods
Upon comparing the sustainability and the analytical performance of our developed method with the previously published methods for the estimation of the same binary mixture, we found that the suggested technique was simpler, greener and needed shorter time of analysis (Table 2). Regarding the simplicity, the suggested technique was the simplest, as it consumed the lowest volume of only one solvent and consequently the minimal volume of waste was generated, while most previously published methods employed large volume of two or more solvent. From the greenness point of view, our developed methodology was one of the greenest methodologies because most of the reported methods consumed large amounts of the solvents (mostly the hazardous methanol and acetonitrile). Also, some methods used hazardous solvents like toluene and chloroform which are harmful to both the analyst and the environment. While NMR spectroscopy may have lower throughput compared to high-throughput techniques such as mass spectrometry, it offers unparalleled structural and dynamic information that many other methods cannot provide. Although its operational costs can be higher, the ability of NMR to deliver comprehensive, non-destructive analysis and precise molecular characterization often justifies the investment, especially in applications where detailed molecular insights are critical.
Conclusion
An efficient, eco-friendly, fast, precise, and dependable 1H-qNMR technique was designed for the concurrent determination of a recent FDA approved binary combination of ASP and OMP. The presented method represents the first application of the non-destructive 1H-qNMR technique for the concurrent analysis of ASP and OMP. Validation of the suggested method was achieved in compliance with ICH recommendations. It is effectively employed to analyze ASP and OMP in their pure form, synthetic mixtures, and pharmaceutical dosage forms. The established method was applied for analyzing both drugs in single and combined dosage form with high %recovery and low RSD. The analyses were achieved using phloroglucinol (internal standard) and DMSO-d6 (solvent). The superiority of our developed method over the other reports lies in its quick analysis, flexibility in reference substance selection (no necessity for pure analytes), non-destructive capability to recover the analyte, and capability of analyzing multi-component mixtures without requiring any prior separation steps. The greenness, whiteness and blueness of the developed method were assessed, and the results indicated the exceptional greenness in terms of consuming a very small amount of solvent. These advantages have facilitated the application of 1H-qNMR in the QC analysis of the studied substances in their dosage forms. Moreover, it is expected to pave the way for numerous future applications, including pharmacokinetic studies, forensic and environmental analyses.
Availability of data and materials
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Hennekens CH, Dyken ML, Fuster V. Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1997;96:2751–3.
Dai Y, Ge J. Clinical use of aspirin in treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Thrombosis. 2012;2012:245037.
Roderick P, Wilkes H, Meade T. The gastrointestinal toxicity of aspirin: an overview of randomised controlled trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;35:219–26.
Sharma T, Bliden K, Chaudhary R, Tantry U, Gurbel PA. Efficacy of aspirin (325 mg) + omeprazole (40 mg) in treating coronary artery disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18:123–31.
Monzani A, Oderda G. Delayed-release oral suspension of omeprazole for the treatment of erosive esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients: a review. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:17–25.
Veltri KT. Yosprala: a fixed dose combination of aspirin and omeprazole. Cardiol Rev. 2018;26:50–3.
Gaziano TA, Young CR, Fitzmaurice G, Atwood S, Gaziano JM. Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based method for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk: the NHANES I follow-up study cohort. The Lancet. 2008;371:923–31.
Malisetty SK, Rambabu C. Simultaneous determination of aspirin and esomeprazole magnesium in combined tablets by validated UPLC method. Pharm Methods. 2013;4:26–9.
Nassar MWI, Attia KAM, Mohamed AA, Shahin M. HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of aspirin and omeprazole in their new combination. Anal Chem Lett. 2017;7:438–44.
Patel VB, Patel AD, Shah DA. Stability indicating liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of aspirin and omeprazole. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2018;15:351–60.
Abdelazim AH, Ramzy S. Application of different quantitative analytical techniques for estimation of aspirin and omeprazole in pharmaceutical preparation. BMC Chemistry. 2022;16:60.
El-Din MS, Eid M, Zeid A. Simultaneous determination of methocarbamol and aspirin by RP-HPLC using fluorescence detection with time programming: its application to pharmaceutical dosage form. Luminescence. 2013;28:332–8.
Khan H, Bandewar SS, Zameeruddin M, Bharkad VB. Spectroscopic determination of aspirin and omeprazole by absorbance ratio and multicomponent mode method. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol (IJPSN). 2017;10:3900–5.
Abo-Gharam AH, El-Kafrawy DS, Abdel-Khalek MM, Mahrous MS, Belal TS. Spectrophotometric and chromatographic methods for simultaneous determination of aspirin and omeprazole. Anal Chem Lett. 2020;10:240–62.
Elmasry MS, Hassan WS, El-Mammli MY, Badrawy M. Earth friendly spectrophotometric methods based on different manipulation approaches for simultaneous determination of aspirin and omeprazole in binary mixture and pharmaceutical dosage form: comparative statistical study. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2022;266:120436.
El-Din MS, Eid M, Zeid AM. Simultaneous determination of methocarbamol and aspirin binary mixture in their combined tablets by derivative and ratio derivative spectrophotometry. Anal Methods. 2015;7:5674–81.
Holzgrabe U, Deubner R, Schollmayer C, Waibel B. Quantitative NMR spectroscopy—applications in drug analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;38:806–12.
Paniagua-Vega D, Cavazos-Rocha N, Huerta-Heredia AA, Parra-Naranjo A, Rivas-Galindo VM, Waksman N, Saucedo AL. A validated NMR method for the quantitative determination of rebaudioside A in commercial sweeteners. J Food Compos Anal. 2019;79:134–42.
El-Masry AA, El-Wasseef DR, Eid M, Shehata IA, Zeid AM. Quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance method for simultaneous analysis of fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride in nasal spray formulation. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2021;8:210483.
Salem YA, El-Sayed SM, El-Masry AA. Whiteness and greenness appraisal approaches for quantitative determination of recently approved combination of indacaterol and mometasone via utilization of nuclear magnetic resonance technique. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2024;39:101522.
El-Masry AA, Zeid AM, El-Wasseef DR, Eid M, Shehata IA. A validated quantitative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-qNMR) method for quantification of a novel anti-coagulant drug (betrixaban maleate) with assessing its stability by application to degradation study. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2020;10:768–83.
El-Masry AA, Zeid AM. RGB-algorithm whiteness appraisal approach for quantitative determination of clopidogrel and aspirin in presence of salicylic acid as a degradation product based on proton NMR technique. Microchem J. 2024;203:110948.
Anastas PT, Kirchhoff MM. Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:686–94.
Gałuszka A, Migaszewski Z, Namieśnik J. The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2013;50:78–84.
de la Guardia M, Garrigues S. Handbook of green analytical chemistry. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines, Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2(R1), November 2005.
Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited; 2005.
Loftsson T. Drug stability for pharmaceutical scientists. Cambridge: Academic press; 2014.
Gałuszka A, Migaszewski ZM, Konieczka P, Namieśnik J. Analytical eco-scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2012;37:61–72.
Keith LH, Brass HJ, Sullivan DJ, Boiani JA, Alben KT. An introduction to the national environmental methods index. Environ Sci Technol. 2005. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/es053241l.
Płotka-Wasylka J. A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: green analytical procedure index. Talanta. 2018;181:204–9.
Zeid AM, El-Masry AA, El-Wasseef DR, Eid M, Shehata IA. Green microemulsion electrokinetic chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of azelastine and budesonide. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2022;29:100795.
Płotka-Wasylka J, Wojnowski W. Complementary green analytical procedure index (ComplexGAPI) and software. Green Chem. 2021;23:8657–65.
Pena-Pereira F, Wojnowski W, Tobiszewski M. AGREE—analytical GREEnness metric approach and software. Anal Chem. 2020;92:10076–82.
El-Semary MS, El-Emam AA, Belal F, El-Masry AA. Impressive spectrofluorimetric framework for determination of newly approved anti-coagulant betrixaban using silver-nanoparticles; with assessment of blueness, whiteness and greenness. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2024;39:101581.
El-Masry AA, Zeid AM. Acriflavine: an efficient green fluorescent probe for sensitive analysis of aceclofenac in pharmaceutical formulations. BMC Chem. 2023;17:93.
Abdallah N, Elmansi H, Ibrahim F. Facile green spectrophotometric approaches for the determination of three natural edible antioxidant polyphenols in different matrices. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2024;318:124428.
Nowak PM, Wietecha-Posłuszny R, Pawliszyn J. White analytical chemistry: an approach to reconcile the principles of green analytical chemistry and functionality. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2021;138:116223.
El-Masry AA, Zeid AM. Nano-scale analytical insights for determination of vonoprazan and aspirin in a recently approved combined preparation utilizing nucleophilic substitution reaction, along with evaluation approaches for both greenness and whiteness. Microchem J. 2024;197:109788.
Manousi N, Wojnowski W, Płotka-Wasylka J, Samanidou V. Blue applicability grade index (BAGI) and software: a new tool for the evaluation of method practicality. Green Chem. 2023;25:7598–604.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). There are no funding sources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.A. carried out the practical work A.A, N.A. and A.M wrote the main manuscript. A.A, N.A. and A.M revised the manuscript and supervised the whole work. All authors have read, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Masry, A.A., Zeid, A.M. & Abdallah, N.A. Greenness, blueness, and whiteness evaluation of a quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance procedure for concurrent assay of aspirin and omeprazole in their single and fixed-dose combined tablets. BMC Chemistry 19, 117 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13065-025-01477-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13065-025-01477-3